2 atomic statements

[المحاور]

Someone can say that my thoughts in this topic are axiomatic and not so interesting to scientists, to me, I'm a beginner in science, and this's my first serious reading for science, I started with Chemistry, like an introduction, I'm trying to be free thinker and to find something useful to me and others.

In my first reading and thinking, I found 2 statements about atom:

- Atom identity is determined by protons in its nucleus
- Atom tends to stability

The statement of the atom identity made me to remember the laws of thought of Aristotle, it's like a living example for identity, there's no 2 elements are the same although all elements atoms are using or built of same particles.

[المحاور]

There's some details and explanations for these axiomatic statements, but what I'm trying to do in these days is how I can use such statements and results. We know that man uses holy book verses in his thinking and his life, how can we use science like that.

If we looked in Quran, we'll find that it uses some examples from nature, it's difficult to use clearly examples from pure science
otherwise people of old ears wouldn't understand 'em and it would be strange thing or maybe for another reasons I've no idea about 'em.

[المحاور]

What we mean with irreligiosity? Is it just attacking religions?! Is it becoming low level individuals?!

From my visions, irreligiosity is undetermined atmosphere, you make the formation with a book you write, for that visions told me to write the devil's gospels.

I assume that the irreligiosity is a good or high degree of mind using and science, free thinking and good level ideas.

If we spent all of our time in attacking religion, this's a low level work, we're not in real irreligiosity.

I saw vision that science is the enemy of the wanted direction of the Absent, so they want us to be ignorant individuals.

That side which is talking and advice in religion, has no idea what's religion is or what holy books mean.

[FreeMason]

On what ground these "claims" stand?

[المحاور]

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة FreeMason

On what ground these "claims" stand?

"claim" is a word I was thinking in at the time I was typing this thread, repeating a word I was thinking in before disturbing me, forgive my strange ways.

These are just points I noticed by my mind, you can consider 'em personal, there's no bible for irreligiosity to judge thinking like this.

[المحاور]

With thinking I reached to a usage of the 2 statements I typed, I called it the apparent identity.

The apparent identity is the maximum amount of elements of particular field person can manage in qualification and stability.

There's many details, and my result is under the study, for example, put in the consideration the quality and complexity of the field or the activity.

We don't know protons in man but we can measure 'em by what his mind positivity attract and hold, what we can consider it like electrons

[المحاور]

Suppose there's no religion, my thinking was how man can do without religion, this's the irreligiosity, you do nothing with attacking religion all the time, it's necessary to determine who you are, what's your thinking ways, how can you walk in this life.

I saw religious models in my life, most of 'em are fake, now I'm looking inside irreligiosity and start to see some fake things, it's like someone has no faith in anything, he can talk in religion side or irreligion side, he or they have no real faith in anything, they make you to believe that you're wrong only, nothing is right you do or think, so what's the game, in this method, if you believe in God you'll be afraid to mislead others, if you don't believe , you've no problem how you lead others

Is there God in that kind of thinking, do they think that they will go to heaven 100%, I don't know how, do they think that they're doing good

[المحاور]

I was thinking and reached to the apparent identity, maybe it's right, maybe it's not, this's not the case, what I tried to reach to is that how can irreligios use free thinking or science.

I think maybe this's just beginning, the apparent identity made new ideas, for example, the identity weight of writer and painter, I've new view now, the good writer deal with books and articles, many of 'em and in different fields, like that the painter who deal with different views and artistic works, there's richness in both fields of that active writer and active painter.

The new ideas and views the painter makes and writer does, the writer is heavy identity and the painter too. This makes a mental feeling about these identities, makes you close to these characters and understand something about 'em

[المحاور]

I wrote these points about the apparent identity today, you can consider 'em like a rough copy:

- The apparent identity can be measured by its weight by the maximum amount of elements of particular field or activity the identity can manage in qualification and stability.

- The radioactivity of the identity (isn't discussed yet)

- The energy levels and potential energy of the elements.

[المحاور]

- Put in the consideration the quality, complexity and level height of the field or the activity in measurement of the weight of the identity.

- The exchange between elements in their levels like electrons.

- The attraction power isn't the same between elements levels and the identity